Ben Kenjes

My name is Ken I have a Bachelors Degree I like Lego, Star Wars, Beer, Frisbees, and the ~outdoors~.

Jan 23
nosubjectkid:

nationalpost:

Lego’s ‘pink ghetto’ draws fire over gender-specific marketingThe Lego backlash was perhaps inevitable. When the maker of countless little coloured bricks sold all over the world decided to create a line of products designed specifically with girls in mind, it was broaching a delicate subject.Sure enough, as Lego Friends was being rolled out this month, sets in which the girls of Heartlake City can do things like visit the vet and hang out at an ice cream café, criticism descended upon the Danish toy giant.“Lego’s pink ghetto,” read one headline. An advocacy group compiled 50,000 signatures on a petition that decried Lego for implying that “girls are not interested in their products unless they’re pink, cute, or romantic.” Among the thousands of critical messages on social media rallying around the “LiberateLego” hashtag was a typical post: “There’s already a type of Lego for girls. It’s called LEGO!!!”Mess with the gender-neutral bull, you get the horns.

KEN BENJES, lego fanboy, weigh in!

The Lego Group’s past offerings of ‘girl toys’ were really shitty.  These ones are pretty rad via
The new ‘doll figures’ are the same height as the standard minifigs and the hair is interchangeable.  Past ‘girl’ product lines featured barbie-esque figures.
The sets feature actual building, whereas past ‘girl’ sets often had very little building at all.  The sets themselves are on par with other sets.  Past ‘girl’ lines were really shitty.
These are really cool sets.
The way they are packaged there is nothing that says FOR GIRLS.  IDK, I feel like it’s just another theme that kids who aren’t into battles or conflicts (which are 80% of Lego themes) can enjoy.  It expands on the City theme, which is great, especially since Lego themes in general lack women minifigures.  And one of the sets has a scientist girl, which is cool or something.
Lego created pretty sexist patriarchy promoting sets in the 90s when female figures only appeared as pirate wenches, princesses, and barmaids.
I just wish they had used standard figures instead of these new ones.  
Or go back to the golden age of Lego (75-88ish) when every figure was androgynous/gender-neutral (words that I probably didn’t use correctly).
So those are some of my thoughts.  Also I am geeking out over all then new colors that are available.

nosubjectkid:

nationalpost:

Lego’s ‘pink ghetto’ draws fire over gender-specific marketing
The Lego backlash was perhaps inevitable. When the maker of countless little coloured bricks sold all over the world decided to create a line of products designed specifically with girls in mind, it was broaching a delicate subject.

Sure enough, as Lego Friends was being rolled out this month, sets in which the girls of Heartlake City can do things like visit the vet and hang out at an ice cream café, criticism descended upon the Danish toy giant.

“Lego’s pink ghetto,” read one headline. An advocacy group compiled 50,000 signatures on a petition that decried Lego for implying that “girls are not interested in their products unless they’re pink, cute, or romantic.” Among the thousands of critical messages on social media rallying around the “LiberateLego” hashtag was a typical post: “There’s already a type of Lego for girls. It’s called LEGO!!!”

Mess with the gender-neutral bull, you get the horns.

KEN BENJES, lego fanboy, weigh in!

The Lego Group’s past offerings of ‘girl toys’ were really shitty.  These ones are pretty rad via

  • The new ‘doll figures’ are the same height as the standard minifigs and the hair is interchangeable.  Past ‘girl’ product lines featured barbie-esque figures.
  • The sets feature actual building, whereas past ‘girl’ sets often had very little building at all.  The sets themselves are on par with other sets.  Past ‘girl’ lines were really shitty.
  • These are really cool sets.

The way they are packaged there is nothing that says FOR GIRLS.  IDK, I feel like it’s just another theme that kids who aren’t into battles or conflicts (which are 80% of Lego themes) can enjoy.  It expands on the City theme, which is great, especially since Lego themes in general lack women minifigures.  And one of the sets has a scientist girl, which is cool or something.

Lego created pretty sexist patriarchy promoting sets in the 90s when female figures only appeared as pirate wenches, princesses, and barmaids.

I just wish they had used standard figures instead of these new ones.  

Or go back to the golden age of Lego (75-88ish) when every figure was androgynous/gender-neutral (words that I probably didn’t use correctly).

So those are some of my thoughts.  Also I am geeking out over all then new colors that are available.


  1. magneticstrip reblogged this from nationalpost and added:
    tell you I wouldn’t have wanted to play with whatever...is supposed to be. I had plenty of...
  2. princessozma reblogged this from holtoncaynes and added:
    God this is so completely unnecessary. My sisters and I had lego and loved it. We didn’t need it to be pink and...
  3. mygzyap reblogged this from coffeecigarettesand-hormones
  4. justynbieberlake reblogged this from nationalpost
  5. remyd reblogged this from ericum
  6. crackinwise reblogged this from nationalpost and added:
    I mean, honestly. Girl or boy, you’re going...even if you only have
  7. yukisato99 reblogged this from nationalpost
  8. ootnaboot reblogged this from nationalpost
  9. one-tsp-one-teaspoon reblogged this from benkenjes
  10. lukehackney reblogged this from nationalpost
  11. cupcakecourtney reblogged this from nationalpost and added:
    aimed towards girls, I see nothing wrong...this. If it encourages creativity and play...
  12. naptimeraptime reblogged this from nationalpost and added:
    excited about letting Boo Boo explore LEGOs BEFORE they started...these pink,...
  13. kassimeg reblogged this from nationalpost
  14. abohemian1 reblogged this from nationalpost
  15. thedreadvampy reblogged this from tinocka and added:
    NORMAL LEGO IS AWESOME SPEAKING AS A GIRLY GIRL Those aren’t even proper Lego figures :| Proper Lego girls look like...
  16. stuckonfckingyou reblogged this from nationalpost
  17. insolitapuella reblogged this from nationalpost
  18. merveilles-du-jour reblogged this from nationalpost
  19. elpamy reblogged this from nationalpost
  20. smoonie reblogged this from nationalpost
  21. holtoncaynes reblogged this from tinocka and added:
    OKAY, this here is a sore spot for me. It’s actually based in science that many boys prefer certain toys and many girls...
  22. lostfrostprince reblogged this from professorbutterscotch and added:
    My thing is, with this lego incident specifically, is that not all girls like what’s out there. Some girls actually WANT...
  23. inbonobo reblogged this from nationalpost and added:
    Riiight. No manufacturer should ever be allowed...differentiate his
  24. benkenjes reblogged this from nosubjectkid
  25. tinocka reblogged this from nationalpost
  26. professorbutterscotch reblogged this from nationalpost and added:
    I’m just interested...know why exactly ‘regular’ lego is somehow not...
  27. thetackle reblogged this from nationalpost and added:
    uh huh uh huh uh huh but before LEGO FRIENDS...released I read this article somewhere